<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>SEO and Tech Daily - Latest Comments in Now I'm convinced.  BING could be HUGE.</title><link>http://seoandtechdaily.disqus.com/</link><description>The Daily Scoop on SEO, SEM, PPC Trends, Analytics, Web 2.0 start-ups and more!</description><atom:link href="https://seoandtechdaily.disqus.com/now_im_convinced_bing_could_be_huge/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 05:15:46 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Now I'm convinced.  BING could be HUGE.</title><link>http://anzman.blogspot.com/2009/06/now-im-convinced-bing-could-be-huge.html#comment-20615947</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think Bing is having different approach for listing sites. The results are based on some research and authority rather than relying heavily on on-page and backlinks factors.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SEO services</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 05:15:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Now I'm convinced.  BING could be HUGE.</title><link>http://anzman.blogspot.com/2009/06/now-im-convinced-bing-could-be-huge.html#comment-11496721</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, but not as huge as Google.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Blogal IT</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 05:44:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Now I'm convinced.  BING could be HUGE.</title><link>http://anzman.blogspot.com/2009/06/now-im-convinced-bing-could-be-huge.html#comment-11458965</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Now I'm convinced. BING could be HUGE.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jsy1001</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 13:47:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Now I'm convinced.  BING could be HUGE.</title><link>http://anzman.blogspot.com/2009/06/now-im-convinced-bing-could-be-huge.html#comment-11137192</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I searched for 5 different things that other search engines have trouble with. Bing did't find relevant answers either. Not switching myself.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Patel</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 19:22:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Now I'm convinced.  BING could be HUGE.</title><link>http://anzman.blogspot.com/2009/06/now-im-convinced-bing-could-be-huge.html#comment-10970189</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"convert 5 miles to km " works just fine on Bing.  "1km in m" isn't a unit conversion.&lt;br&gt;"convert 1 inch to nm" works as well.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eric</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 02:16:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Now I'm convinced.  BING could be HUGE.</title><link>http://anzman.blogspot.com/2009/06/now-im-convinced-bing-could-be-huge.html#comment-10961612</link><description>&lt;p&gt;and you can do:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Calculation&lt;br&gt;2x^2+3x-19=0 : x=2.422144, x=-3.922144&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daryl</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 01:18:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Now I'm convinced.  BING could be HUGE.</title><link>http://anzman.blogspot.com/2009/06/now-im-convinced-bing-could-be-huge.html#comment-10960933</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for stopping by and addressing the Bing comments Stefan.  I really wasn't big on the 'bottom toolbars' until I came across the Wibiya closed beta.  Likin' it a lot.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">charlieanzman</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 00:51:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Now I'm convinced.  BING could be HUGE.</title><link>http://anzman.blogspot.com/2009/06/now-im-convinced-bing-could-be-huge.html#comment-10959917</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Stefan Weitz from Bing (@bing) here.  Yes, i know our conversion is wonky - we aren't firing as much as we should on obvious conversion queries.  The good news is we can do all the conversions, we just need to tweak the grammars to make sure they appear consistently.  Cool toolbar on the bottom of the site, btw.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stefan Weitz</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 00:03:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Now I'm convinced.  BING could be HUGE.</title><link>http://anzman.blogspot.com/2009/06/now-im-convinced-bing-could-be-huge.html#comment-10959810</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"1km in m" doesn't work on Bing but "1 km in m" does. Notice the space between the "1" and "km".&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sure, you could criticize Bing for not figuring that out easily, but who cares?  Google has trained us all to search a specific way, so who cares if Bing has nuances.  Different search syntax for unit conversion is hardly a deal breaker for anyone.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Try searching for "kobe bryant" in Bing and compare to what you get in Google.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">The Pessimist</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 23:59:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Now I'm convinced.  BING could be HUGE.</title><link>http://anzman.blogspot.com/2009/06/now-im-convinced-bing-could-be-huge.html#comment-10959441</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well for one thing, I can't seem to do unit conversions I tried things like "1km in m" and "1inch in nm". I don't convert units frequently, but Google has been there when I needed it for this. Not Bing. Although it seems like it works for currency conversions, why not units? Queries like "Coffee in toronto" fail to return what it should, as it does in Google. What I did like though is  the result page for "Google" on Bing - or Microsoft, or Yahoo, big company names. I like how the results are divided into different categories, jobs, services, products, etc.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">naelshawwa</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 23:44:51 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>